Technical depth

The technical depth behind the support systems

I investigate complex enterprise problems, build the operational systems around them, and use software and AI to make those workflows more scalable.

95%

Issue reproduction rate

Turning customer reports into reproducible technical evidence before Engineering picks them up.

30%

Less Engineering investigation time

Better reproduction, logs and context mean less time spent reconstructing the problem from scratch.

25%

Faster P1 and P2 resolution

Observability dashboards and clearer escalation paths give critical incidents better context earlier.

01 · Investigation

Technical investigation and reproduction

I work from the customer report back toward the system. That means reproducing the issue, checking logs, testing API behaviour, narrowing conditions and documenting what is actually known.

REST APIsPostmanDatadogKibanaElasticsearchBrowser DevToolsDNS
What this looks like in practice: 95% issue reproduction rate and 30% less Engineering investigation time.
02 · Identity and integrations

Authentication, SSO and enterprise integrations

A large part of enterprise support is understanding where systems meet. I troubleshoot identity, provisioning, API and integration problems across customer environments rather than treating them as isolated tickets.

SAMLOAuthSSOSCIMSlackMicrosoft TeamsSMTP
What this looks like in practice: complex enterprise migrations, authentication failures and integration troubleshooting across 100+ accounts.
03 · Escalation systems

Incidents, escalation and Engineering handoffs

I care about the point where Support hands a problem to Engineering. The quality of that handoff changes how quickly the issue can move, so I focus on evidence, reproducibility, severity, environment and what has already been ruled out.

RootlyJiraConfluenceDatadogP1 and P2Escalation playbooks
What this looks like in practice: structured P1 and P2 escalation ownership and a portfolio project built around evidence-based Engineering handoffs.
04 · Support operations

Workflows, knowledge and customer signals

I look for the repeated work behind the queue. If the same issue, request or escalation keeps appearing, I want to understand whether the fix is better documentation, a workflow, automation or a clearer path into Product and Engineering.

SalesforceFreshdeskZendeskJiraKnowledge workflowsFeedback intake
What this looks like in practice: customer feedback workflows, escalation playbooks, internal guides and repeatable support processes.
05 · AI and automation

AI-assisted support systems

I use AI where it helps structure, analyse or draft support work, but I keep evidence and decision authority separate from the model. The interesting part for me is not adding AI to a workflow. It is deciding where AI belongs and where it does not.

OpenAI Responses APIAnthropic Claude APITypeScriptJavaScriptZodCloudflare WorkersSupabase
What this looks like in practice: deterministic validation, human approval points, grounded prompts and secure API routing across my portfolio projects.
06 · Building

Enough software depth to build the workflow

I am not trying to position myself as a software engineer. I use code because sometimes the clearest way to explore a support problem is to build the system I think should exist.

Next.jsTypeScriptJavaScriptSQLGit and GitHubDockerHTML and CSS
What this looks like in practice: shipped AI tools, REST APIs, persistent data models, tests and production deployments.
Support → Engineering

Engineering Escalation Engine

Next.js and TypeScript system for structured intake, AI-assisted analysis, deterministic escalation scoring, evidence validation, human approval and auditable Engineering handoffs.

Project write-up coming soon →
Support → Product

Feedback Loop

Turns scattered feature requests into grouped themes, structured product signals and a product brief without losing the original customer evidence.

View case study →
Support → Knowledge

Support Ticket Analyser

Matches tickets against existing knowledge, identifies documentation gaps and uses AI to draft reviewable KB content when the gap is real.

View case study →
InvestigationDatadog, Kibana, Elasticsearch, Browser DevTools, Postman, log analysis, issue reproduction
APIs and identityREST APIs, SAML, OAuth, SSO, SCIM, DNS, SMTP, authentication troubleshooting
Support operationsFreshdesk, Salesforce, Zendesk, Intercom, Jira, Confluence, Rootly, Slack
Build and automationNext.js, TypeScript, JavaScript, SQL, Git and GitHub, Docker, Zod, Supabase, Cloudflare Workers
AIOpenAI Responses API, Anthropic Claude API, prompt design, structured outputs, evidence validation, AI workflow design
IBM AI FundamentalsGenerative AI: Prompt EngineeringDatadog: Performance MonitoringREST APIsSQLLinuxPython, ongoing
PA

Madiha's Portfolio Assistant

Ask me anything